This is the
Commonwealth Games and the Asian Games year. One would have expected the National
Anti-Doping Agency (NADA) to be geared up to tackle the doping menace in the
country that increases when multi-discipline games are around.
The bedrock of
anti-doping measures is out-of-competition testing. For that to be effective at
any level, an anti-doping agency has to have a ‘whereabouts’ programme.
Surprisingly, NADA
has struggled with its ‘whereabouts’ during the past two years when it showed
its desire to implements the programme, fed up as it was with athletes evading
testers at national camps.
A ‘whereabouts’
list forces an athlete to make himself/herself available at a particular spot
for at least one hour on any given day as per advance information submitted by
the athlete.
But NADA is busy
nowadays, it seems, with its plans to hold workshops in its larger project of ‘education
and awareness' programme. Nothing wrong with this of course, provided the
primary task of weeding out the ‘cheats’ is being accomplished.
In order to “identify,
advise and formulate” an anti-doping education plan NADA has formed an Expert Group.
It plans to hold 100 workshops in 2014-15 across the country in collaboration
with various stakeholders.
Expert Group
The Expert Group
is loaded with disciplinary/appeal panel members, current and former, and
doctors. In order to assess the awareness levels among athletes and coaches, it
would have been ideal to have representatives of the current athletes and
coaches, having years of experience in the national camps. Especially from
among Olympic sports, say athletics, weightlifting, wrestling, instead of a
game like chess_which is surely not known for its doping problems_which one of
the members, Bharat Singh Chauhan represents as a former player and
administrator in this panel. He also happens to be a former hearing panel
member.
Should the ministry/NADA opt to bring in representatives of coaches and/or athletes, care could be
taken to keep away “known doping sympathizers” from among coaches and to
include “clean” athletes in order to understand their problems in getting
information or to ascertain whether current educational material is percolating
down to the campers.
A similar
exercise of taking representation from among coaches and support personnel
engaged in several coaching programmes of the SAI could also have been undertaken.
The awareness campaign
has been termed ‘IEC’ which apparently means Information, Education and
Communication.
And that raises
the question, should there not be a ‘communication’ and/or ‘information’ expert
in this Expert Group?
Should we also not
have a Federation or IOA representative in it? After all, they are people who
should be aware of the problems of the athletes, the types of awareness
campaigns that go on in the camps, what the roles their coaches play at such
locations etc.
Shockingly,
there is no one from NADA in the panel. That means there will be none to
provide an insight into what NADA had achieved in this sphere for the past five
years, whatever little it could be.
Pick from WADA
You may also ask,
what more can this panel find out and recommend that is not available in WADA’s ‘Education and Awareness section?.
For the past two
years, NADA has tried to revamp its website without success. Whether because of
bureaucratic hurdles or because of lack of interest, its website has remained
dormant since mid-2012.
In this age of ‘electronic
information’, it is extremely disappointing to see that the NADA website has
retained a “Coming Soon” message on its Home page for nearly two years. The
internet having revolutionized communication systems, there could be no agency
in the world that does not utilize this facility to its fullest advantage.
Education and awareness can begin here rather than in committee rooms.
NADA’s website is an apology in comparison to that of its
counterparts in the UK, USA, Australia etc.
Despite
being in existence for five years, the NADA website has not even managed to
place on record the names of the suspended athletes on a timely basis (within
20 days of a decision being given by a panel is mandatory as per WADA Code),
does not have a ‘supplements warning’ section, has nothing on ‘education
programme’ nothing for the athletes barring some rules and a copy of the
Prohibited List (the 2014 List was posted only last month), nothing for coaches
and support personnel and practically nothing for the media, barring some
age-old schedules.
No sign of the new Code
It is yet to post the 2015 WADA Code which has been
published in almost all the websites of anti-doping authorities all over the
world months ago. And it has plans to hold seven Workshops that would deal with
the 2015 Code which has brought in several changes to the 2009 version.
NADA is also yet to print the 2014 Prohibited List
and distribute it among all the stakeholders.
Take a
look at the UK Anti-Doping website and you are likely to be thoroughly impressed by the sheer
volume of information available there.
One can be
assured the ‘Expert Group for IEC campaign” will surely recommend that NADA set
up a “vibrant, dynamic, informative, user-friendly website” that will cater to
the needs of the athletes, support personnel, media, National Federations, SAI, schools, universities etc.
Drug Reference Online
In
order to make the website more helpful for the athletes, NADA should lose no
time in getting a Global Drug Reference Online (DRO) in place in
collaboration with either the UKAD or the USADA.
The
DRO is of great help to the athletes who can check out drugs, even those
prescribed by a doctor and find out whether those are prohibited. It is also
available in Australia,
Germany, South Africa, Canada, Switzerland and Ireland
The proposed
workshops could be beneficial if the presentations and discussions
there could reach doctors manning government dispensaries in remote villages
who prescribe nandrolone or stanozolol (steroids) for typhoid or
methylhexaneamine (MHA) and mephentermine (stimulants) for cough and cold! And
if budding, ill-educated athletes in villages could be told of the harmful
effects of steroids etc.
There would be little point in several scientists
and doctors, coaches and officials, and athletes who are already familiar with
the prohibited substances and methods, the dangers of doping, the WADA Code and
disciplinary procedures being told of all these all over again as it quite
often happens in these types of workshops and seminars.
The
‘whereabouts’ awaits NADA’s attention as it concentrates on the National
campers getting ready for the Commonwealth Games, less than four month away,
and the Asian Games after that. Routine camp visits will not be of help as it
looks to have been the case since, apart from departmental meets and some
junior meets, NADA has not had an important ‘catch’ for several months.
2 comments:
It's clear that none of the officials and athletes want the whereabouts clause to be implemented seriously. And there may be special agents who tip off athletes when WADA/NADA officials are at their doorstep to test athletes. And coaches who have been publicly saying that doping should be 'legalised', since we can't catch the culprits, are now in national camps. That seems to be the scene here.
It is not clear what is delaying the 'whereabouts' programme of the NADA, especially in athletics. Who cares as long as we get medals in multi-discipline games! SAI, Govt etc would have drawn up targets by now for CWG and Asiad and as long as those targets are met no one could really be bothered.
Post a Comment