Indian
athletics history from the 1980s will show that normally additional trials are
arranged to pick the relay squads just before departure. Sometimes the trials are held even at the
venue of the Games!
Twice, at
least in one’s memory, trials were held at the venue of the Asian Games to
determine who would be the ‘first choice four in the women's 4x400m team, in Seoul in 1986 and in Busan
in 2002.
This time,
as the team gets ready for the Incheon Asian Games_well, Korea again, the
coaches may please note, if one more
trial has to be gone through in a Games venue!_ yet another trial has been
planned, hopefully the last time for these Games.
On
Thursday, September 18, 2014, the men’s 4x400m relay team will be given another
chance to make the ‘cut’ for Incheon. Also in the fray would be woman long
jumper Mayookha Johny and triple jumper Renjith Maheswary.
Men's 4x400 team disappoints
The men's relay
team clocked a disappointing 3,08.62 as against the standard of 3,06.49, though it must be
admitted the team was without the services of one of the leading
quarter-milers, Arokia Rajiv, who in fact has been the No. 1 for more than a
season now, notwithstanding the loss to Kunhumohammed at Patiala. Rajiv was supposed to be nursing a minor injury. By the way, the announcement by SAI that fitness tests were being conducted on injured athletes and in future such tests would be must should be welcomed. But what kind of tests are being carried out? Is it just a matter of producing a medical certificate stating that you are fit, which seems to be the case?
Back to relay trials, an Olympian compared that timing of the men's 4x400 quartet with those achieved by the Indian teams in the 1960s.
Back to relay trials, an Olympian compared that timing of the men's 4x400 quartet with those achieved by the Indian teams in the 1960s.
Renjith was
supposed to attempt the norm of 16.56m at the Continental Cup at Marrakech,
Morocco. But he ended up last there with an unbelievable 15.91m. As a junior in
2004 he had crossed 16 metres.
Renjith shows slump in form
This season
Renjith had produced efforts of 16.43 (Fed Cup) and 16.54 (Inter-State). These
were not really befitting his stature or his record (17.07) that was bettered
only this year by the rising star from Punjab, Arpinder Singh. The latter
posted a sensational 17.17 to upset Renjith as well as take the Inter-State
title and book his place in the Commonwealth Games team. At Glasgow, Arpinder
was not that spectacular, reaching only 16.63 for the bronze.
The AFI has
high hopes on Arpinder for the Asian Games.
Mayookha
has been struggling since recording a 6.56 in the Inter-State long jump
competition that earned her a place in the team to Glasgow. There she did a
shocking 6.11 in qualification. Back home she did more shockingly, a 6.08 at Patiala.
Switch to triple jump
Given
another chance to perform along with Renjith and shot putter Om Prakash Singh,
Mayookha opted rather unexpectedly for triple jump and came up with 13.18 at
Patiala on September 15. She was still short of the qualification guideline
that the AFI had set, that of 13.39. There are more than a dozen other Asians,
apart from the Indians, who have crossed 13.39 this season.
Mayookha and
M. A. Prajusha have been selected for both long jump and triple jump.
Now, the
question is what are these athletes going to show differently in a matter of
just days? Even if they achieve the ‘so-called’ guidelines or standards or qualification
marks, will there be any credibility in those efforts?
How long
will the AFI keep giving chances to athletes to achieve norms that might not
have been achieved in certain other cases that are ‘confirmed entries’ for the
Games ?
Is there a bias?
The
argument, it seems, is in favour of giving a last chance to “experienced
athletes”. Since the Government has cleared the whole squad of 56 athletes
named by the AFI, including Renjith, Om Prakash and Mayookha, there is no worry
for the federation to show results. It wants to ascertain the form on its own,
though there is a clear tilt towards a select batch of athletes.
Questions
have been asked in the media why, for example, Tamil Nadu’s long jumpers Kumaravel
Premkumar and M. Vigneswar (7.90m in Inter-State) cannot be given similar
chance like that is being given to a few others.
Premkumar’s
drastic slide in form has been mysterious. He complained of having recovered
from chicken pox during the Inter-State in June, while doing a seven-metre jump
in the qualification round that was not sufficient to get him into the final.
Back in
action at Patiala during the Fed Cup, Premkumar topped the qualifiers into the
final with a jump of 7.42 metres. And then the most unexpected happened. In the
final the Tamil Nadu athlete who holds the National record at 8.09m, managed
just 6.82m to finish last.
Indian
athletics comes up with such surprises quite often and when one such happens
during an Asian Games, in reverse order, you might just savor the sight of a
medal!
Could the
selectors have been faulted for not considering Premkumar? ‘No’ will have to be the answer. The long jump
standard stands at 7.63m. The selectors ignored Vigneshwar’s Lucknow effort of
7.90m and instead only looked at his Patiala performance of 7.39m. They could
not have been faulted for not going by a solitary 7.90 performance.
Case of javelin throwers
Then there
are the cases of javelin throwers Davinder Singh and Rohit Kumar. Davinder, who
could not qualify for the final of the Commonwealth Games, touched 78.57 at the
Fed Cup, good enough to beat the norm of 76.50, but not good enough to get the
vote from the selectors.
Rohit
Kumar, coming back from a doping suspension, had 76.61m. He too found himself
out of favour as the selectors picked the gold medallist, Rajender Singh Dalvir
who had a 79.32m.
Selection
Committee Chairman Gurbachan Singh Randhawa was quoted in a report as saying
that he found little chance for Renjith to make the team. The Olympian hurdler
also felt that it would be tough for shot putter Om Prakash to come back after
having sprained an ankle prior to the re-trials.
Om Prakash
also has shown stagnation around the 19-metre mark this season, except for a
reported throw of 19.74m in the US in June.
Randhawa
feels that selection has to be based on merit and performance and not on
reputation and past record. He is not in favour of any more trials.
But the AFI seems to have made up its mind. For those familiar with this scenario there is
nothing surprising.
Criteria diluted
The Sports
Authority of India (SAI), busy pruning an unwieldy Indian contingent for the
Games, and the ministry have had very little time to devote to the athletics
squad, it would seem.
Not all the
selected athletes have attained the ‘sixth-place standard’ prescribed by the
Government, especially in distance events in both sections. The argument in favour of diluting the
standards at least in the women’s distance events could be that these events quite
often provide very little opposition and a medal can come about without really
showing top form.
Last time,
prior to Glasgow Games, Renjith had pulled out of a possible re-trial stating
that he had had enough. If he competes this time will he pull it off?
Post-script
Renjith
Maheswary and Mayookha Johny made the grade in triple jump at the re-trials at
Patiala today (Sept 18, 2014). Not unexpectedly, one would say. Renjith jumped
16.61m as against the selection guideline of 16.56 while Mayookha did 13.56m as
against the standard of 13.39m.
The 4x400 quartet
of Kunhumohammed, Arun K. J., Jibin Sebastian and Arokia Rajiv timed 3,07.05 in
the re-trials, coming closer to the standard of 3,06.49. A different
combination had timed 3,08.62 last Monday.
The AFI issued a release on Thursday night to state that Renjith and Mayookha were cleared for participation in the Asian Games following the re-trials while it had decided to drop the men's 4x400 relay team. Kunhumohammed and Arokia Rajiv, the two entries in the men's 400m would be allowed to proceed.
-last update at 8.00 p.m Sept 18, 2014
-last update at 8.00 p.m Sept 18, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment